Skip to content
Jake Bentley

#13Jake Bentley

QB·South Carolina·20189.2 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Jake Bentley is a Dual-Threat QB for South Carolina. Jake's 2018 season ranks in the 75th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 409 plays — a above-average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jake Bentley's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2018 Production

Passing
240/388 Comp/Att3171 Pass yards27 Pass TD14 INT61.9% Comp %
Rushing
88 Rush yards2 Rush TD64 Carries1.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency75
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat91
  • Consistency78
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)75th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (75th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.83 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Chattanooga.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8300.83Wk 1 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.67 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Georgia: +0.06 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Vanderbilt: +0.45 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Kentucky: +0.19 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Texas A&M: +0.26 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Tennessee: +0.43 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Ole Miss: +0.57 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Florida: +0.55 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Chattanooga: +0.83 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Clemson: +0.50 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Akron: -0.07 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Virginia: -0.04 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsCoastal CarolinaW49-15-17.222/2925040-100.67
2vsGeorgiaL17-4132.930/47269121000.06
4@VanderbiltW37-147.619/28261114500.45
5@KentuckyL10-2413.113/28148133700.19
6vsMissouriW37-3520.8
7vsTexas A&ML23-2621.617/3522331900.26
9vsTennesseeW27-245.511/16152112000.43
10@Ole MissW48-449.822/3236320810.57
11@FloridaL31-3523.018/2823921810.55
12vsChattanoogaW49-925/2933940-1200.83
13@ClemsonL35-5629.732/5051051-2000.50
14vsAkronW28-3-19.314/2719932-140-0.07
1vsVirginiaL0-287.117/3921802-20-0.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
55.4%
Passing plays
95.2%
Rushing plays
12.4%
Standard downs
50.8%
Passing downs
66.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.22
Passing downs
0.66
Pass / Rush EPA
0.38 / 0.35

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.920−0.16
EPA per play · 2018 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.