Skip to content
Jacob Jenkins
Jacob Jenkins

#84Jacob Jenkins

TE·Liberty·2025

Jacob Jenkins is a Versatile TE for Liberty.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.42
    Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.46
    Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jacob Jenkins's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
14 Receptions191 Rec yards2 Rec TD13.6 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume9
  • Explosiveness44
  • Consistency74
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • ▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • ▸7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 1.14 from the first to second half of the season.
  • ▸Peak game: 2.72 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Louisiana Tech (SP+ -1).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.720−2.72Wk 2 vs Jacksonville State: +0.66 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Bowling Green: -0.27 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs James Madison: +0.86 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Old Dominion: +0.69 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs UTEP: +0.36 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Delaware: +1.97 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Missouri State: +0.55 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Florida International: +1.27 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Louisiana Tech: +2.72 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
2@Jacksonville StateL24-34-6.722713.50170.66
3@Bowling GreenL13-23-12.6166.006-0.27
4vsJames MadisonL13-3112.3199.0090.86
5@Old DominionL7-215.911010.00100.69
7@UTEPW19-8-17.5199.0090.36
10vsDelawareW59-30-10.938327.71431.97
11vsMissouri StateL17-21-10.73227.30150.55
12@Florida InternationalL27-34-10.511919.00191.27
13@Louisiana TechL28-34-1.3166.0162.72

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
3.2%
Passing plays
8.2%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
3.3%
Passing downs
2.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.88
Passing downs
1.24
Pass / Rush EPA
0.97 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.