Skip to content
Jackson Sharman

#8Jackson Sharman

Jackson Sharman is a Clutch Passer for Sacramento State. Jackson's 2026 season produced 9.3 total EPA across 43 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jackson Sharman's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
33/59 Comp/Att397 Pass yards4 Pass TD2 INT55.9% Comp %
Rushing
-7 Rush yards0 Rush TD8 Carries-0.9 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

57
Attempts
10.2y
Avg depth
2.2y
After catch
58%
Catch rate

The ball travels 10.2 yards in the air on an average throw 1.7 yards deeper than the median. Another 2.2 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
3
33% · 36y
0
6
33% · 70y
short
12
75% · 47y
16
50% · 83y
20
65% · 101y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch63
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Peak game: 0.40 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Mississippi Valley State.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4000.40Wk 1 vs Mississippi Valley State: +0.40 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Fresno State: -0.17 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsMississippi Valley StateW52-018/282474120.1100.40
2@Fresno StateL3-49-7.615/3115001-80-0.17

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
47.5%
Passing plays
96.7%
Rushing plays
8.0%
Standard downs
38.2%
Passing downs
73.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.28
Pass / Rush EPA
0.27 / -0.45

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.