Skip to content
Hendon Hooker

#5Hendon Hooker

QB·Tennessee·2022202111.3 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Hendon Hooker is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Tennessee. Hendon's 2021 season ranks in the 83th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 427 plays — a above-average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Hendon Hooker's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Passing
206/302 Comp/Att2945 Pass yards31 Pass TD3 INT68.2% Comp %
Rushing
620 Rush yards5 Rush TD167 Carries3.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency83
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat81
  • Consistency87
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)83th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency87th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (83th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.82 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs South Alabama (SP+ -7).

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8200.82Wk 1 vs Bowling Green: +0.77 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Pittsburgh: +0.44 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tennessee Tech: +0.56 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Florida: +0.25 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Missouri: +0.70 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs South Carolina: +0.43 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Ole Miss: +0.37 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Alabama: +0.39 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Kentucky: +0.56 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Georgia: +0.05 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs South Alabama: +0.82 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Vanderbilt: +0.50 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Purdue: +0.39 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsBowling GreenW38-6-12.41/150092.00.77
2vsPittsburghL34-4117.615/211882175.44900.44
3vsTennessee TechW56-017/251993065.26410.56
4@FloridaL14-3811.013/232212059.92300.25
5@MissouriW62-243.115/192253094.78010.70
6vsSouth CarolinaW45-203.917/232253095.86610.43
7vsOle MissL26-3114.817/262331078.410810.37
8@AlabamaL24-5226.019/282823176.62700.39
10@KentuckyW45-4213.415/203164076.64100.56
11vsGeorgiaL17-4132.024/372441170.5700.05
12vsSouth AlabamaW60-14-7.217/202732093.72110.82
13vsVanderbiltW45-21-19.410/181562053.47500.50
1vsPurdueL45-4810.326/413785076.15900.39

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
49.2%
Passing plays
80.6%
Rushing plays
24.9%
Standard downs
45.7%
Passing downs
58.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.32
Passing downs
0.62
Pass / Rush EPA
0.46 / 0.30

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.180−0.162022
EPA per play · 2021 — 2022 · 24 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Tennessee
11.3
289.1
2022Tennessee
11.7
268.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.