Skip to content
Hahsaun Wilson

#14Hahsaun Wilson

RB·UTEP·2025

Hahsaun Wilson is a Committee Back for UTEP. Hahsaun's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 52 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Hahsaun Wilson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
225 Rush yards1 Rush TD46 Carries4.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
7 Receptions41 Rec yards0 Rec TD5.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume24
  • Explosiveness38
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving68
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.28 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.65 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs UT Martin.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6600.66Wk 1 vs Utah State: -0.66 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UT Martin: +0.65 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Texas: +0.23 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UL Monroe: -0.08 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.02 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Liberty: -0.39 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Kennesaw State: -0.44 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Jacksonville State: -0.29 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs New Mexico State: +0.28 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Delaware: -0.38 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@Utah StateL16-28-3.1120-0.66
2vsUT MartinW42-17811714.610.65
3@TexasL10-2716.26396.500.23
4vsUL MonroeL25-31-21.610212.101240-0.08
5vsLouisiana TechL11-30-1.37284.002600.02
7vsLibertyL8-19-9.0830.40270-0.39
10@Kennesaw StateL20-33-5.4221.00-0.44
11vsJacksonville StateL27-30-6.7111.00-0.29
13vsNew Mexico StateL31-34-15.5294.500.28
14@DelawareL31-61-10.9252.50120-0.38

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.5%
Passing plays
3.2%
Rushing plays
15.7%
Standard downs
7.0%
Passing downs
11.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.32
Passing downs
0.44
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.18 / 0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.