Skip to content
Gunner Stockton

#14Gunner Stockton

Gunner Stockton is a Clutch Passer for Georgia. Gunner's 2026 season produced 38.2 total EPA across 33 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

43%
projected
band 25%'25 50%61%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Gunner Stockton's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
28/32 Comp/Att436 Pass yards8 Pass TD0 INT87.5% Comp %
Rushing
3 Rush yards0 Rush TD1 Carries3.0 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

31
Attempts
6.3y
Avg depth
12.0y
After catch
87%
Catch rate

The ball travels 6.3 yards in the air on an average throw 2.2 yards shorter than the median. Another 12.0 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
1
100% · 20y
3
33% · 43y
0
short
10
90% · 142y
3
100% · 38y
14
93% · 179y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume77
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.27 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Western Kentucky (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2701.27Wk 1 vs Tennessee State: +1.03 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Western Kentucky: +1.27 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsTennessee StateW63-315/16202301.03
2vsWestern KentuckyW70-20-13.113/162345095.8301.27

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
26.8%
Passing plays
55.2%
Rushing plays
1.6%
Standard downs
31.3%
Passing downs
11.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.01
Passing downs
2.64
Pass / Rush EPA
1.20 / -0.16

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.800−0.12
EPA per play · 2025 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.