Skip to content
Giovanni Lopez

Giovanni Lopez

Giovanni Lopez is a Clutch Passer for North Carolina. Giovanni's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 337 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Giovanni Lopez's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
170/261 Comp/Att1747 Pass yards10 Pass TD5 INT65.1% Comp %
Rushing
133 Rush yards3 Rush TD86 Carries1.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat37
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency50th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.28 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.65 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Syracuse (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6500.65Wk 1 vs TCU: -0.34 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Charlotte: +0.28 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Richmond: +0.40 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UCF: -0.07 EPA/play4Wk 8 vs California: -0.03 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Virginia: -0.09 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Syracuse: +0.65 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Stanford: +0.42 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Wake Forest: +0.16 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Duke: +0.36 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs NC State: +0.07 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsTCUL14-488.34/1069011.9-100-0.34
2@CharlotteW20-3-26.717/251551049.24400.28
3vsRichmondW41-610/181192031.34010.40
4@UCFL9-34-1.211/14870215.5-50-0.07
8@CaliforniaL18-21-3.219/351670065.7110-0.03
9vsVirginiaL16-1711.123/362081243.4121-0.09
10@SyracuseW27-10-13.115/192162086.43300.65
11vsStanfordW20-15-11.818/252032053.0-600.42
12@Wake ForestL12-285.721/362010066.3200.16
13vsDukeL25-326.621/272041065.22010.36
14@NC StateL19-424.811/161181067.3-800.07

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
52.2%
Passing plays
83.4%
Rushing plays
21.4%
Standard downs
46.7%
Passing downs
65.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.03
Passing downs
0.39
Pass / Rush EPA
0.21 / 0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.