Farrod Green Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Mississippi State

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs TE peers

Player type

Vertical Threat TE

Elite deep receiver who stretches the field. Wins downfield, commands safety attention, and creates the threat that opens underneath routes.

Downfield threatYAC upsideCreates space for teammates

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency87th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Peak game: 3.53 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs LSU (SP+ 21).

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Long	EPA/play
1	vsCharleston Southern	W49-0	—	2	68	34.0	62	2.65
3	vsLSU	W37-7	21.1	1	22	22.0	22	3.53
9	@Texas A&M	W35-14	9.4	3	51	17.0	41	1.26
10	vsMassachusetts	W34-23	-9.7	1	9	9.0	9	1.35
11	vsAlabama	L24-31	33.5	2	24	12.0	23	—

Snap-share proxy

Overall

2.3%

Passing plays

6.4%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

2.2%

Passing downs

2.4%

EPA by down type

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Plays

Usage

vs AlabamaWk 11

Rec 2 · Rec Yds 24 · Avg 12.0 · Rec TD 0