Skip to content
Evan Bullock

#7Evan Bullock

Evan Bullock is a Clutch Passer for Louisiana Tech. Evan's 2025 season produced -6.6 total EPA across 48 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Evan Bullock's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
26/46 Comp/Att243 Pass yards0 Pass TD2 INT56.5% Comp %
Rushing
-5 Rush yards0 Rush TD12 Carries-0.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume87
  • Dual-Threat40
  • Consistency51
  • Clutch84
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency51th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.2600.26Wk 7 vs Kennesaw State: -0.26 EPA/play7Wk 11 vs Delaware: -0.12 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Washington State: +0.11 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
3vsNew Mexico StateW49-14-15.5
7@Kennesaw StateL7-35-5.411/21112019.610-0.26
11@DelawareL24-25-10.911/15950127.6-70-0.12
12@Washington StateL3-283.84/10360019.8100.11

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
30.5%
Passing plays
58.0%
Rushing plays
6.3%
Standard downs
28.2%
Passing downs
35.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.23
Passing downs
-0.01
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.08 / 0.10

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.