Skip to content
Emani Bailey

#9Emani Bailey

RB·TCU·20232.1 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Emani Bailey is a Featured Back for TCU. Emani's 2023 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 220 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Emani Bailey's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
1209 Rush yards8 Rush TD223 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
25 Receptions184 Rec yards1 Rec TD7.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency8
  • Volume76
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency69
  • Receiving35
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency69th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.14 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.63 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Colorado (SP+ -5).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6300.63Wk 1 vs Colorado: +0.63 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Nicholls: +0.35 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Houston: +0.21 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs SMU: +0.28 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs West Virginia: -0.18 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Iowa State: +0.32 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs BYU: +0.01 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Kansas State: +0.22 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Texas Tech: +0.07 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Texas: +0.19 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Baylor: -0.03 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Oklahoma: +0.30 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsColoradoL42-45-4.91416411.700.63
2vsNichollsW41-619673.5011600.35
3@HoustonW36-13-7.8231265.5132300.21
4vsSMUW34-1710.1251265.0111100.28
5vsWest VirginiaL21-247.519552.904250-0.18
6@Iowa StateL14-277.5211527.2021500.32
7vsBYUW44-11-3.313614.701700.01
8@Kansas StateL3-4116.2121008.302800.22
10@Texas TechL28-356.119573.0253600.07
11vsTexasL26-2923.221984.710.19
12vsBaylorW42-17-8.316533.322190-0.03
13@OklahomaL45-6915.0211507.1142410.30

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
26.6%
Passing plays
5.1%
Rushing plays
56.5%
Standard downs
31.0%
Passing downs
17.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.11
Passing downs
0.47
Pass / Rush EPA
0.42 / 0.15

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.710−0.27
EPA per play · 2023 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.