Skip to content
Eli Sanders

#1Eli Sanders

Eli Sanders is a Explosive Back for USC. Eli's 2025 season ranks in the 98th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 50 plays — a elite rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Eli Sanders's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
258 Rush yards2 Rush TD44 Carries5.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
8 Receptions126 Rec yards1 Rec TD15.8 Yards/rec
Returns
4 Kick returns59 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency98
  • Volume38
  • Explosiveness58
  • Consistency65
  • Receiving67
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)98th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency65th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.60 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.45 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Missouri State (SP+ -11).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.4501.45Wk 1 vs Missouri State: +1.45 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Georgia Southern: +0.65 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Purdue: +0.19 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Michigan State: +0.25 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Illinois: -0.30 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Michigan: +0.53 EPA/play7
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsMissouri StateW73-13-10.75336.6017311.45
2vsGeorgia SouthernW59-20-9.48526.5221300.65
3@PurdueW33-17-6.110757.501200.19
4vsMichigan StateW45-31-3.413846.5021700.25
5@IllinoisL32-3412.98141.801100-0.30
7vsMichiganW31-1312.411100.53

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.2%
Passing plays
4.9%
Rushing plays
20.5%
Standard downs
14.1%
Passing downs
10.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
1.06
Pass / Rush EPA
0.96 / 0.19

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.700−0.51
EPA per play · 2024 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.