Skip to content
E. Jai Mason

#7E. Jai Mason

E. Jai Mason is a Versatile WR for Charlotte. E.'s 2025 season produced 23.6 total EPA across 39 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So E. Jai Mason's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
31 Receptions423 Rec yards4 Rec TD13.6 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns14 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume20
  • Explosiveness44
  • Consistency60
  • Pass-Down59
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency60th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.25 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 3.24 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs App State (SP+ -11).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+3.2403.24Wk 1 vs App State: +3.24 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs North Carolina: -0.55 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Monmouth: +2.18 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Rice: -0.25 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs South Florida: +0.88 EPA/play6Wk 9 vs North Texas: +1.99 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs East Carolina: +0.11 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UTSA: -0.97 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Georgia: +2.03 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Tulane: +1.08 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsApp StateL11-34-11.422914.51163.24
2vsNorth CarolinaL3-20-6.64276.8012-0.55
3vsMonmouthW42-351022822.82622.18
4vsRiceL17-28-14.84246.0011-0.25
6@South FloridaL26-5411.6122.0120.88
9vsNorth TexasL20-5413.822211.00131.99
11@East CarolinaL22-488.03186.0090.11
12vsUTSAL7-283.7284.004-0.97
13@GeorgiaL3-3524.113838.00382.03
14@TulaneL0-276.322713.50201.08

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.0%
Passing plays
12.7%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
6.2%
Passing downs
8.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.58
Passing downs
0.64
Pass / Rush EPA
0.60 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.