Skip to content
Donaven McCulley
Donaven McCulley

#1Donaven McCulley

Donaven McCulley is a Slot Specialist WR for Michigan. Donaven's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 78 plays — a elite rate for the WR. A four-star recruit in the class of 2021, Donaven has lived up to his recruiting pedigree.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Donaven McCulley's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2021

4-Star · High major target
Stars
247 composite
0.9167
National rank
#223
High school
Lawrence North
Hometown
Indianapolis, IN

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2025 Production

Receiving
39 Receptions588 Rec yards3 Rec TD15.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume26
  • Explosiveness54
  • Consistency61
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency61th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.09 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.70 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Maryland (SP+ 1).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.7002.70Wk 1 vs New Mexico: +0.57 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Oklahoma: +0.45 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Central Michigan: +0.68 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Nebraska: +0.10 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Wisconsin: +1.42 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs USC: +1.02 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Washington: +0.05 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Michigan State: -0.38 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Purdue: -0.40 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Northwestern: +0.60 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Maryland: +2.70 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Ohio State: +0.58 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsNew MexicoW34-170.94317.8090.57
2@OklahomaL13-2418.339130.30440.45
3vsCentral MichiganW63-3-8.833612.00160.68
4@NebraskaW30-276.233913.00160.10
6vsWisconsinW24-10-4.4611218.71331.42
7@USCL13-3116.933913.01191.02
8vsWashingtonW24-718.422110.50150.05
9@Michigan StateW31-20-3.4199.009-0.38
10vsPurdueW21-16-6.1155.005-0.40
12vsNorthwesternW24-225.845914.80260.60
13@MarylandW45-200.624623.01242.70
14vsOhio StateL9-2730.134615.30260.58
20vsTexasL27-4116.245413.5019

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
9.2%
Passing plays
21.4%
Rushing plays
0.4%
Standard downs
7.1%
Passing downs
14.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.29
Passing downs
0.69
Pass / Rush EPA
0.50 / -0.46

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.230−0.42
EPA per play · 2021 · 6 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.