Skip to content
Deuce Lawrence

#22Deuce Lawrence

Deuce Lawrence is a Committee Back for Wake Forest.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Deuce Lawrence's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
97 Rush yards1 Rush TD25 Carries3.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
3 Receptions9 Rec yards0 Rec TD3.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume58
  • Explosiveness18
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving42
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.2800.28Wk 1 vs Akron: +0.15 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Purdue: -0.28 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsAkronW38-16-21.413524.012-300.15
2@PurdueW38-361.212453.801120-0.28

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
20.4%
Passing plays
4.7%
Rushing plays
35.2%
Standard downs
28.3%
Passing downs
4.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.17
Passing downs
-0.01
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.73 / -0.10

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.