Skip to content
De'Zhaun Stribling
De'Zhaun Stribling

#1De'Zhaun Stribling

WR·Oklahoma State·2024

De'Zhaun Stribling is a Versatile WR for Oklahoma State. De'Zhaun's 2024 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 64 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So De'Zhaun Stribling's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving
52 Receptions892 Rec yards6 Rec TD17.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume27
  • Explosiveness68
  • Consistency79
  • Pass-Down70
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency79th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • ▸9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.66 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • ▸Peak game: 2.58 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs West Virginia (SP+ 2).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.580−2.58Wk 1 vs South Dakota State: +1.64 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arkansas: +0.35 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tulsa: +2.06 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Utah: +1.38 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Kansas State: +1.36 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs West Virginia: +2.58 EPA/play6Wk 9 vs Baylor: +1.61 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Arizona State: +0.91 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs TCU: +0.52 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Texas Tech: +0.92 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Colorado: -0.49 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsSouth Dakota StateW44-20—68313.80271.64
2vsArkansasW39-3111.04389.50190.35
3@TulsaW45-10-20.6717424.92632.06
4vsUtahL19-227.735016.70221.38
5@Kansas StateL20-4214.1715722.41771.36
6vsWest VirginiaL14-382.125427.01432.58
9@BaylorL28-388.42157.5091.61
10vsArizona StateL21-429.457715.40360.91
11@TCUL13-3810.8710114.41310.52
13vsTexas TechL48-564.3713319.01350.92
14@ColoradoL0-528.12105.007-0.49

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
9.4%
Passing plays
16.3%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
9.3%
Passing downs
9.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.98
Passing downs
1.10
Pass / Rush EPA
1.02 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.