#3Darius Curry

QB·Colorado State·2025

Darius Curry is a Clutch Passer for Colorado State. Darius's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 78 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.46
Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.51
Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Darius Curry's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing

70/107 Comp/Att740 Pass yards5 Pass TD7 INT65.4% Comp %

Rushing

25 Rush yards0 Rush TD17 Carries1.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

Efficiency0
Volume100
Dual-Threat0
Consistency52
Clutch100

Player type

Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency52th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Peak game: 0.90 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs San Diego State (SP+ 7).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	EPA/play
6	@San Diego State	L24-45	6.7	5/5	51	1	0	95.8	14	0.90
9	@Wyoming	L0-28	-11.3	9/16	112	0	0	24.4	5	0.06
11	vsUNLV	L10-42	4.3	4/6	36	0	1	24.4	3	-0.10
12	@New Mexico	L17-20	0.9	26/34	248	2	3	36.9	-20	0.22
13	@Boise State	L21-49	3.1	26/46	293	2	3	29.7	23	0.03

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

38.0%

Passing plays

56.4%

Rushing plays

10.4%

Standard downs

33.3%

Passing downs

46.2%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: -0.03
Passing downs: 0.36
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.26 / -0.60

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).