Skip to content
Daejon Reynolds

#3Daejon Reynolds

WR·UNLV·2025

Daejon Reynolds is a Slot Specialist WR for UNLV. Daejon's 2025 season produced 34.7 total EPA across 44 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Daejon Reynolds's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
33 Receptions471 Rec yards5 Rec TD14.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume15
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency74
  • Pass-Down79
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 3.27 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs UCLA (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+3.2703.27Wk 1 vs Sam Houston: -0.13 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UCLA: +3.27 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Miami (OH): +0.49 EPA/play4Wk 7 vs Air Force: +2.22 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Boise State: -0.02 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs New Mexico: +1.53 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Utah State: +0.62 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Hawai'i: +0.53 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Nevada: +1.83 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Boise State: +1.40 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
0vsIdaho StateW38-31199.019
1vsSam HoustonW38-21-27.811212.0012-0.13
2vsUCLAW30-23-8.713232.00323.27
4@Miami (OH)W41-38-3.444511.30180.49
7vsAir ForceW51-48-3.2413934.81862.22
8@Boise StateL31-563.12147.008-0.02
10vsNew MexicoL35-400.957815.61351.53
12vsUtah StateW29-26-3.13144.7190.62
13vsHawai'iW38-101.76457.51150.53
14@NevadaW42-17-13.424321.50221.83
15@Boise StateL21-383.133913.00211.40
20vsOhioL10-17-4.0111.001

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.3%
Passing plays
11.0%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
3.5%
Passing downs
9.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.70
Passing downs
0.87
Pass / Rush EPA
0.79 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.