Skip to content
D'Eriq King

#1D'Eriq King

QB·Houston·2020201814.0 pts line value1st Round

D'Eriq King is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Houston. D'Eriq's 2018 season ranks in the 88th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 447 plays — a above-average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So D'Eriq King's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2018 Production

Passing
219/345 Comp/Att2982 Pass yards36 Pass TD6 INT63.5% Comp %
Rushing
674 Rush yards14 Rush TD111 Carries6.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency88
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency89
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)88th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency89th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (88th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.95 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs South Florida (SP+ -1).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Blake SimsAlabama0.69615.4329.4
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9500.95Wk 1 vs Rice: +0.70 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arizona: +0.56 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Texas Tech: +0.43 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Texas Southern: +0.59 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Tulsa: +0.36 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs East Carolina: +0.30 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Navy: +0.71 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs South Florida: +0.95 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs SMU: +0.41 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Temple: +0.47 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Tulane: +0.32 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@RiceW45-27-26.417/24320303310.70
2vsArizonaW45-183.617/34246403120.56
3@Texas TechL49-638.730/51431504710.43
4vsTexas SouthernW70-1420/2520031-410.59
6vsTulsaW41-26-11.219/271653211720.36
7@East CarolinaW42-20-14.913/2320920110.30
8@NavyW49-36-10.225/38413305610.71
9vsSouth FloridaW57-36-1.228/404195213220.95
10@SMUL31-45-5.411/22175205410.41
11vsTempleL49-592.928/463225112510.47
12vsTulaneW48-17-3.511/1582108210.32

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
53.3%
Passing plays
87.0%
Rushing plays
23.1%
Standard downs
47.6%
Passing downs
65.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.32
Passing downs
0.90
Pass / Rush EPA
0.52 / 0.61

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.050−0.112020
EPA per play · 2018 — 2020 · 22 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2018Houston
14.0
307.4
2020Miami
9.7
244.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.