#5Cooper Legas

QB·Tulsa·2024

Cooper Legas is a Dual-Threat QB for Tulsa. Cooper's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 170 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.46
Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.51
Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cooper Legas's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing

87/162 Comp/Att1144 Pass yards12 Pass TD6 INT53.7% Comp %

Rushing

201 Rush yards1 Rush TD79 Carries2.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

Efficiency0
Volume90
Dual-Threat71
Consistency58
Clutch100

Player type

Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency58th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.51 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 1.14 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs North Texas (SP+ -5).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
1	vsNorthwestern State	W62-28	—	—	—	—	—	—	7	0	0.60
3	vsOklahoma State	L10-45	-2.6	2/3	30	0	0	25.3	3	0	0.48
5	@North Texas	L20-52	-4.5	2/3	45	1	0	97.7	8	0	1.14
6	vsArmy	L7-49	9.2	4/7	20	0	0	64.8	81	1	0.23
8	@Temple	L10-20	-20.3	3/4	17	0	0	27.7	20	0	0.34
9	vsUTSA	W46-45	2.2	16/31	333	5	0	45.3	46	0	0.59
10	@UAB	L21-59	-11.3	21/38	230	2	1	13.9	-4	0	-0.01
12	vsEast Carolina	L31-38	-1.0	20/32	293	3	1	49.7	43	0	0.31
13	@South Florida	L30-63	-2.3	10/25	113	1	3	2.2	14	0	-0.17
14	vsFlorida Atlantic	L16-63	-12.7	9/19	63	0	1	0.6	-17	0	-0.48

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

31.5%

Passing plays

43.7%

Rushing plays

19.2%

Standard downs

28.0%

Passing downs

38.1%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: -0.01
Passing downs: 0.46
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.16 / 0.25

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).