Skip to content
Collin Dixon

#17Collin Dixon

Collin Dixon is a Red Zone Weapon WR for Illinois.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

7%
projected
band 3%'25 7%11%

Regressed toward the WR mean. Model correlation r≈0.47 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Collin Dixon's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Receiving
17 Receptions236 Rec yards5 Rec TD13.9 Yards/rec

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

21
Targets
11.2y
Avg depth
4.0y
After catch
81%
Catch rate

The ball travels 11.2 yards in the air on an average target 2.3 yards deeper than the median. Another 4.0 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
2
100% · 70y
0
1
0% · 0y
short
10
80% · 95y
1
100% · 2y
7
86% · 69y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume53
  • Explosiveness46
  • Consistency50
  • Pass-Down53
Player type
Red Zone Weapon WR

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Peak game: 1.64 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs UAB (SP+ -16).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.6401.64Wk 1 vs UAB: +1.64 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Duke: +1.06 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsUABW42-23-16.067011.72181.64
2vsDukeL27-316.61116615.13401.06

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
18.4%
Passing plays
39.6%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
17.0%
Passing downs
23.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.22
Passing downs
1.24
Pass / Rush EPA
1.22 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.