Skip to content
Cole Gonzales

#9Cole Gonzales

Cole Gonzales is a Clutch Passer for Charlotte. Cole's 2026 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 73 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cole Gonzales's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
42/62 Comp/Att450 Pass yards3 Pass TD3 INT67.7% Comp %
Rushing
37 Rush yards2 Rush TD11 Carries3.4 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

59
Attempts
7.7y
Avg depth
4.2y
After catch
71%
Catch rate

The ball travels 7.7 yards in the air on an average throw 0.8 yards shorter than the median. Another 4.2 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
2
0% · 0y
3
67% · 81y
2
100% · 59y
short
27
70% · 145y
3
0% · 0y
22
86% · 165y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat19
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch76
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.2900.29Wk 1 vs The Citadel: +0.29 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Ole Miss: +0.05 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsThe CitadelL41-4328/41322323120.29
2@Ole MissL9-4113.314/2112801600.05

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
52.5%
Passing plays
88.7%
Rushing plays
15.6%
Standard downs
47.4%
Passing downs
64.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
0.32
Pass / Rush EPA
0.24 / -0.01

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.