Skip to content
Caullin Lacy

#5Caullin Lacy

Caullin Lacy is a Slot Specialist WR for South Alabama. Caullin's 2023 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 104 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Caullin Lacy's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
91 Receptions1316 Rec yards7 Rec TD14.5 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Kick returns40 KR yards0 KR TD21 Punt returns210 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume38
  • Explosiveness50
  • Consistency82
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency82th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.59 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.96 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs UL Monroe (SP+ -22).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.9601.96Wk 1 vs Tulane: +0.39 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs SE Louisiana: +0.84 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Oklahoma State: +1.13 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Central Michigan: +1.21 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs James Madison: +1.75 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UL Monroe: +1.96 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Southern Miss: +0.55 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Louisiana: +0.95 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Troy: +0.92 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Arkansas State: +0.01 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Marshall: +0.96 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Texas State: +0.33 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@TulaneL17-372.87608.60200.39
2vsSE LouisianaW35-17813917.41840.84
3@Oklahoma StateW33-76.7510420.82571.13
4vsCentral MichiganL30-34-19.1613222.02721.21
5@James MadisonL23-3111.8613222.00551.75
6@UL MonroeW55-7-21.6715622.31501.96
8vsSouthern MissW55-3-14.4910311.40340.55
9vsLouisianaL20-330.4713118.70620.95
10@TroyL10-289.89899.90300.92
11vsArkansas StateW21-14-6.37507.10260.01
12vsMarshallW28-0-9.0912614.00380.96
13@Texas StateL44-52-1.611948.51230.33

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.3%
Passing plays
27.2%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
10.4%
Passing downs
19.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.47
Passing downs
1.35
Pass / Rush EPA
0.90 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.