Skip to content
Cardell Williams
Cardell Williams

#6Cardell Williams

Cardell Williams is a Dual-Threat QB for Sacramento State. Cardell's 2025 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 253 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cardell Williams's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
110/175 Comp/Att1621 Pass yards10 Pass TD7 INT62.9% Comp %
Rushing
382 Rush yards12 Rush TD99 Carries3.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency8
  • Volume97
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch92
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
2@NevadaL17-20-13.411/1315811--3200.05

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
34.0%
Passing plays
79.5%
Rushing plays
14.0%
Standard downs
28.9%
Passing downs
45.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
0.47
Pass / Rush EPA
0.23 / 0.52

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.