Skip to content
Cam Porter

#4Cam Porter

Cam Porter is a Explosive Back for Northwestern.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cam Porter's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
137 Rush yards1 Rush TD18 Carries7.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
3 Receptions23 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency98
  • Volume43
  • Explosiveness92
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving56
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)98th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.39 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Western Illinois.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3900.39Wk 1 vs Tulane: +0.37 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Western Illinois: +0.39 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@TulaneL3-236.36467.700.37
2vsWestern IllinoisW42-712917.6132300.39

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
15.0%
Passing plays
4.6%
Rushing plays
26.6%
Standard downs
14.6%
Passing downs
16.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.33
Passing downs
0.54
Pass / Rush EPA
0.54 / 0.35

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.