Skip to content
Cam Fancher

#2Cam Fancher

QB·UCF·2025

Cam Fancher is a Dual-Threat QB for UCF. Cam's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 103 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cam Fancher's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
41/72 Comp/Att333 Pass yards0 Pass TD0 INT56.9% Comp %
Rushing
170 Rush yards1 Rush TD31 Carries5.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency42
  • Clutch59
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency42th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Peak game: 0.53 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Jacksonville State (SP+ -7).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5300.53Wk 1 vs Jacksonville State: +0.53 EPA/play1Wk 6 vs Kansas: -0.17 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Cincinnati: +0.10 EPA/play7
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsJacksonville StateW17-10-6.75/9320066.03900.53
6vsKansasL20-274.18/14790027.1230-0.17
7@CincinnatiL11-204.528/492220061.010810.10

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
43.5%
Passing plays
60.2%
Rushing plays
25.4%
Standard downs
36.3%
Passing downs
57.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.06
Passing downs
0.15
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.09 / 0.59

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.