C J Uzomah Stats, EPA & Player Profile

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs TE peers

Player type

Red Zone Weapon TE

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)—

Game-to-game consistency82th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.47 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 2.88 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Louisiana Tech (SP+ -2).

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	vsArkansas	W45-21	12.2	1	26	26.0	0	26	0.65
5	vsLouisiana Tech	W45-17	-1.7	1	15	15.0	1	15	2.88
6	vsLSU	W41-7	21.5	2	10	5.0	1	9	1.04
7	@Mississippi State	L23-38	22.2	2	23	11.5	0	19	0.55
11	vsTexas A&M	L38-41	20.2	1	12	12.0	0	12	1.14
12	@Georgia	L7-34	27.6	3	39	13.0	0	18	0.97
1	vsWisconsin	L31-34	20.8	1	20	20.0	1	20	1.04

Snap-share proxy

Overall

3.3%

Passing plays

8.8%

Rushing plays

0.3%

Standard downs

1.7%

Passing downs

7.4%

EPA by down type

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Plays

Usage

vs WisconsinWk 1

EPA 1.0

Rec 1 · Rec Yds 20 · Avg 20.0 · Rec TD 1