Skip to content
Byrum Brown

#17Byrum Brown

QB·South Florida·202520235.3 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Byrum Brown is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for South Florida. Byrum's 2023 season ranks in the 5th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 568 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Byrum Brown's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
276/426 Comp/Att3292 Pass yards26 Pass TD11 INT64.8% Comp %
Rushing
809 Rush yards11 Rush TD203 Carries4.0 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency5
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat91
  • Consistency78
  • Clutch96
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)5th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.71 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Rice (SP+ -10).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7100.71Wk 1 vs Western Kentucky: +0.29 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida A&M: +0.17 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Alabama: -0.15 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Rice: +0.71 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Navy: +0.42 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UAB: +0.31 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.13 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UConn: +0.11 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Memphis: +0.50 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Temple: +0.42 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UTSA: +0.15 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Charlotte: +0.49 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@Western KentuckyL24-41-2.015/341661252.816020.29
2vsFlorida A&MW38-2420/341973043.92320.17
3vsAlabamaL3-1723.114/28870133.7920-0.15
4vsRiceW42-29-10.222/294352083.58210.71
5@NavyW44-30-13.726/343383075.4-2700.42
6@UABL35-56-14.724/432602255.413620.31
7vsFlorida AtlanticL14-56-9.415/261791060.34600.13
8@UConnW24-21-15.627/392030137.06110.11
10@MemphisL50-593.531/383575171.510000.50
11vsTempleW27-23-21.018/263161127.6-1410.42
12@UTSAL21-495.423/392871247.94310.15
13vsCharlotteW48-14-21.422/302534165.04310.49
20vsSyracuseW45-0-4.419/262143074.1640

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
60.4%
Passing plays
94.7%
Rushing plays
30.8%
Standard downs
55.2%
Passing downs
70.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.18
Passing downs
0.46
Pass / Rush EPA
0.28 / 0.35

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.320−0.292025
EPA per play · 2023 — 2025 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023South Florida
5.3
243.1
2025South Florida
8.4
210.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.