Skip to content
Brock Spalding

#10Brock Spalding

Brock Spalding is a Versatile WR for East Carolina. Brock's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 65 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Brock Spalding's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
42 Receptions554 Rec yards3 Rec TD13.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume19
  • Explosiveness41
  • Consistency60
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency60th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 1.02 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.09 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Campbell.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.0902.09Wk 1 vs NC State: +1.10 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Campbell: +2.09 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.80 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs BYU: +0.80 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Army: +1.50 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Tulane: +0.71 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Tulsa: -0.42 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Temple: +0.73 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Charlotte: -0.68 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Memphis: +0.45 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UTSA: -0.74 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.97 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@NC StateL17-244.869716.20391.10
2vsCampbellW56-338127.01552.09
3@Coastal CarolinaW38-0-15.144310.80210.80
4vsBYUL13-3415.966410.70140.80
5vsArmyW28-60.833511.70201.50
7@TulaneL19-266.33175.7170.71
8vsTulsaW41-27-10.013030.0030-0.42
10@TempleW45-14-5.1166.0060.73
11vsCharlotteW48-22-26.73134.305-0.68
12vsMemphisW31-277.658817.60360.45
13@UTSAL24-583.7144.004-0.74
14@Florida AtlanticW42-3-8.757615.21360.97
20vsPittsburghW23-178.4100.000

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.5%
Passing plays
13.5%
Rushing plays
0.9%
Standard downs
6.6%
Passing downs
6.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.36
Passing downs
0.80
Pass / Rush EPA
0.49 / 0.29

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.