Scores
Dev
Go Pro
← Player leaders
Broc Lowry

#12Broc Lowry

Broc Lowry is a Dual-Threat QB for Western Michigan.

2024 Production

Passing
4/8 Comp/Att21 Pass yards0 Pass TD0 INT50.0% Comp %
Rushing
129 Rush yards3 Rush TD24 Carries5.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency28th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.14 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.90 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Northern Illinois (SP+ -4).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Wisconsin: -0.38 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Ohio State: -0.18 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Bethune-Cookman: +1.56 EPA/play3Wk 7 vs Akron: -0.28 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Kent State: +1.31 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Northern Illinois: +1.90 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Bowling Green: -0.03 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Central Michigan: -0.39 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs South Alabama: -0.20 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@WisconsinL14-283.020-0.38
2@Ohio StateL0-5631.20/200013.8160-0.18
3vsBethune-CookmanW59-312301.56
7vsAkronW34-24-17.971-0.28
8@BuffaloW48-41-4.000
9vsKent StateW52-21-33.02/31300100.05711.31
11vsNorthern IllinoisL28-42-3.5111.90
12@Bowling GreenL13-31-1.840-0.03
13@Central MichiganL14-16-15.82/380032.7-0.39
14vsEastern MichiganW26-18-13.3130
1vsSouth AlabamaL23-302.860-0.20

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.2%
Passing plays
4.0%
Rushing plays
6.2%
Standard downs
4.1%
Passing downs
7.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.01
Passing downs
0.42
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.89 / 0.47

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.