Skip to content
Braydon Bennett

#28Braydon Bennett

Braydon Bennett is a Explosive Back for Eastern Michigan.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Braydon Bennett's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
103 Rush yards1 Rush TD21 Carries4.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
1 Receptions22 Rec yards0 Rec TD22.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency98
  • Volume31
  • Explosiveness38
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving30
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)98th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.03 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Michigan State (SP+ 1).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0301.03Wk 1 vs San José State: +0.05 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Michigan State: +1.03 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
0vsSacramento StateW28-17-19.17273.91
1vsSan José StateL21-27-12.85204.000.05
2@Michigan StateL7-351.09566.2012201.03

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
10.9%
Passing plays
1.8%
Rushing plays
24.7%
Standard downs
14.5%
Passing downs
3.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
1.61
Pass / Rush EPA
0.96 / 0.30

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.300−0.33
EPA per play · 2024 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.