Brady Boyd

WR·Utah State·2025

Brady Boyd is a Versatile WR for Utah State. Brady's 2025 season ranks in the 67th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 89 plays — a average rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.47
Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
Total EPA (value)0.45
Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Brady Boyd's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving

46 Receptions743 Rec yards8 Rec TD16.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

Efficiency67
Volume30
Explosiveness61
Consistency49
Pass-Down100

Player type

Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)67th %ile · average

Game-to-game consistency49th %ile · average

Key findings

▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.16 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 1.30 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs San José State (SP+ -14).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Davis Bryson	Kennesaw State	2024	97	0.200	0.0	19.4
Amare Jones	Tulane	2020	71	0.180	0.0	12.8
Hyleck Foster	Marshall	2015	101	0.180	0.5	18.2
Eli Heidenreich	Navy	2025	70	0.220	0.8	15.4
De'Michael Harris	Southern Miss	2019	117	0.130	0.7	15.2

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	vsUTEP	W28-16	-17.5	3	31	10.3	0	17	-0.26
2	@Texas A&M	L22-44	20.7	6	87	14.5	0	24	0.10
3	vsAir Force	W49-30	-3.2	4	72	18.0	0	24	1.01
4	vsMcNeese	W48-7	—	4	84	21.0	2	53	0.64
5	@Vanderbilt	L35-55	20.3	2	14	7.0	1	14	0.67
7	@Hawai'i	L26-44	1.7	5	68	13.6	0	22	-0.28
8	vsSan José State	W30-25	-14.3	3	48	16.0	0	27	1.30
9	@New Mexico	L14-33	0.9	2	27	13.5	0	15	0.05
11	vsNevada	W51-14	-13.4	5	117	23.4	2	53	0.87
12	@UNLV	L26-29	4.3	3	39	13.0	1	18	-0.26
13	@Fresno State	W28-17	1.8	3	42	14.0	1	24	0.58
14	vsBoise State	L24-25	3.1	2	15	7.5	0	13	-0.48
20	vsWashington State	L21-34	3.8	4	99	24.8	1	43	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

10.5%

Passing plays

20.2%

Rushing plays

0.5%

Standard downs

11.4%

Passing downs

8.7%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.05
Passing downs: 0.49
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.17 / 0.07

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).