Skip to content
Bo Wallace

#14Bo Wallace

QB·Ole Miss·201420132.3 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Bo Wallace is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Ole Miss. Bo's 2013 season ranks in the 28th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 499 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Bo Wallace's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2013 Production

Passing
283/437 Comp/Att3346 Pass yards18 Pass TD10 INT64.8% Comp %
Rushing
355 Rush yards6 Rush TD131 Carries2.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2013 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency28
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat56
  • Consistency75
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)28th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.15 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.59 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs LSU (SP+ 29).

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5900.59Wk 1 vs Vanderbilt: +0.20 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Southeast Missouri State: +0.29 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Texas: +0.17 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Alabama: -0.02 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Auburn: +0.09 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Texas A&M: +0.14 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs LSU: +0.59 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Idaho: -0.06 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Arkansas: +0.56 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Troy: +0.39 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Missouri: +0.22 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Mississippi State: +0.11 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Georgia Tech: +0.53 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@VanderbiltW39-357.531/472830073.94820.20
2vsSoutheast Missouri StateW31-138/151882087.31500.29
3@TexasW44-2310.517/251772081.25710.17
5@AlabamaL0-2534.117/311590015.150-0.02
6@AuburnL22-3025.225/483362219.0-800.09
7vsTexas A&ML38-4120.422/363013162.72700.14
8vsLSUW27-2428.730/393460075.51800.59
9vsIdahoW59-14-35.615/221862060.6-80-0.06
11vsArkansasW34-241.527/344163284.01200.56
12vsTroyW51-21-14.517/262723096.56610.39
13vsMissouriL10-2419.326/422440149.7600.22
14@Mississippi StateL10-1710.726/401820319.63100.11
1vsGeorgia TechW25-1711.422/322561191.38620.53

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
52.4%
Passing plays
87.1%
Rushing plays
20.6%
Standard downs
43.2%
Passing downs
73.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.11
Passing downs
0.43
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / 0.18

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.880−0.162014
EPA per play · 2013 — 2014 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2013Ole Miss
2.3
104.4
2014Ole Miss
5.5
181.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.