Skip to content
Barion Brown

#6Barion Brown

Barion Brown is a Versatile WR for Kentucky. Barion's 2024 season produced 22.8 total EPA across 43 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Barion Brown's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
50 Rush yards1 Rush TD13 Carries3.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
29 Receptions361 Rec yards3 Rec TD12.4 Yards/rec
Returns
19 Kick returns449 KR yards1 KR TD1 Punt returns6 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume19
  • Explosiveness36
  • Consistency36
  • Pass-Down66
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency36th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.24 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.01 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Ole Miss (SP+ 28).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.5601.56Wk 1 vs Southern Miss: +0.61 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs South Carolina: -1.56 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia: +0.30 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Ohio: +0.64 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Ole Miss: +1.01 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Vanderbilt: +0.34 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Florida: +0.94 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Auburn: -0.05 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Tennessee: +0.42 EPA/play10Wk 13 vs Texas: +0.90 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Louisville: -0.03 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsSouthern MissW31-0-25.64287.02120.61
2vsSouth CarolinaL6-3116.9-1.56
3vsGeorgiaL12-1324.333411.30180.30
4vsOhioW41-62.35285.60190.64
5@Ole MissW20-1727.958817.60631.01
7vsVanderbiltL13-204.933612.00230.34
8@FloridaL20-4813.825628.01450.94
9vsAuburnL10-249.5188.008-0.05
10@TennesseeL18-2822.03299.70160.42
13@TexasL14-3124.114343.00430.90
14vsLouisvilleL14-4113.62115.507-0.03

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.7%
Passing plays
10.6%
Rushing plays
3.6%
Standard downs
6.9%
Passing downs
6.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.50
Passing downs
0.59
Pass / Rush EPA
0.77 / -0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.