Skip to content
Antwan Raymond

#3Antwan Raymond

Antwan Raymond is a Featured Back for Rutgers. Antwan's 2026 season produced 6.3 total EPA across 43 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

24%
projected
band 17%'25 30%31%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Antwan Raymond's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
176 Rush yards0 Rush TD41 Carries4.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
4 Receptions26 Rec yards1 Rec TD6.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency3
  • Volume94
  • Explosiveness26
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving32
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.2300.23Wk 1 vs Massachusetts: -0.00 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Boston College: +0.23 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsMassachusettsL21-37-25.814423.00280-0.00
2@Boston CollegeL21-28-7.4271345.0021810.23

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
32.8%
Passing plays
5.8%
Rushing plays
66.1%
Standard downs
34.4%
Passing downs
28.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.06
Passing downs
0.39
Pass / Rush EPA
0.83 / 0.07

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.510−0.13
EPA per play · 2025 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.