#7Aeryn Hampton

WR·Oregon State·2026

Aeryn Hampton is a Versatile WR for Oregon State.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.47
Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
Total EPA (value)0.45
Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Aeryn Hampton's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Receiving

8 Receptions78 Rec yards0 Rec TD9.8 Yards/rec

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

Targets

10.0y

Avg depth

5.2y

After catch

57%

Catch rate

The ball travels 10.0 yards in the air on an average target — 1.0 yards deeper than the median. Another 5.2 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards

deep

—

0% · 0y

—

short

75% · 26y

0% · 0y

100% · 2y

leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs WR peers

Efficiency67
Volume33
Explosiveness18
Consistency50
Pass-Down100

Player type

Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)67th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Brandon Chatman	Navy	2025	52	0.230	0.6	12.0
Tyler Buchner	Notre Dame	2021	51	0.250	0.3	12.8
Amare Jones	Tulane	2020	71	0.180	0.0	12.8
Justin Lynch	Temple	2021	63	0.240	0.3	15.1
Amare Jones	Tulane	2019	58	0.230	0.8	13.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	@Houston	L20-33	6.5	4	28	7.0	0	13	0.11
2	vsTexas Tech	L24-35	18.9	4	50	12.5	0	18	0.23

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

11.7%

Passing plays

16.5%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

11.5%

Passing downs

12.1%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: -0.37
Passing downs: 0.96
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.18 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).