Skip to content

Anton Frondell vs Blake Coleman

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Blake Coleman is ahead on 8 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Blake Coleman sits in the 86th percentile, Anton Frondell the 1st.

MeasureFrondellColeman
Scoring · NHL
Points42
Goals11
Assists31
Ice time per game17:3915:01
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1661 pct0.1967 pct
Shot attempts per game2.562 pct2.357 pct
Goals above expected+0.372 pct+0.475 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share33.3%12 pct47.0%40 pct
Chances for per 601.5918 pct2.3852 pct
Chances against per 603.1816 pct2.6833 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.691 pct+0.4986 pct
Creates per 60+0.1764 pct+0.4490 pct
Prevents per 60−0.851 pct+0.0553 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →