Skip to content

Macklin Celebrini vs Chris Tanev

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Macklin Celebrini is ahead on 9 of 12 measures. The widest gap is shot attempts per game: Macklin Celebrini sits in the 96th percentile, Chris Tanev the 2nd.

MeasureCelebriniTanev
Scoring · NHL
Points50
Goals00
Assists50
Ice time per game22:2018:51
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.2271 pct0.003 pct
Shot attempts per game5.596 pct0.32 pct
Goals above expected−0.417 pct0.062 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share53.3%55 pct38.4%20 pct
Chances for per 601.5918 pct2.0941 pct
Chances against per 601.3989 pct3.3512 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.5490 pct+0.2364 pct
Creates per 60+0.3079 pct−0.2013 pct
Prevents per 60+0.2489 pct+0.4498 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →