Skip to content

Konsta Helenius vs Mika Zibanejad

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Konsta Helenius and Mika Zibanejad split the measures 6 each. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Konsta Helenius sits in the 99th percentile, Mika Zibanejad the 34th.

MeasureHeleniusZibanejad
Scoring · NHL
Points15
Goals11
Assists04
Ice time per game14:1620:40
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.2069 pct0.2680 pct
Shot attempts per game2.357 pct2.664 pct
Goals above expected+0.475 pct−0.327 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share66.7%90 pct57.1%66 pct
Chances for per 602.4857 pct2.7667 pct
Chances against per 601.2493 pct2.0859 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+1.0099 pct−0.0334 pct
Creates per 60+0.7199 pct−0.0334 pct
Prevents per 60+0.2993 pct0.0042 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →