Skip to content

Zach Metsa vs Emil Lilleberg

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Zach Metsa is ahead on 7 of 9 measures. The widest gap is expected goals per game: Emil Lilleberg sits in the 36th percentile, Zach Metsa the 1st.

MeasureMetsaLilleberg
Scoring · NHL
Points10
Goals00
Assists10
Ice time per game10:4210:30
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.001 pct0.0736 pct
Shot attempts per game0.01 pct1.015 pct
Goals above expected0.064 pct−0.152 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share51.1%48 pct—
Chances for per 602.6964 pct—
Chances against per 602.5837 pct—
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.0727 pct−0.349 pct
Creates per 60−0.1419 pct−0.383 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0759 pct+0.0350 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →