Skip to content

Connor McMichael vs Chris Tanev

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Connor McMichael is ahead on 10 of 13 measures. The widest gap is shot attempts per game: Connor McMichael sits in the 89th percentile, Chris Tanev the 2nd.

MeasureMcMichaelTanev
Scoring · NHL
Points30
Goals10
Assists20
Ice time per game15:2518:51
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.3186 pct0.003 pct
Shot attempts per game4.089 pct0.32 pct
Goals above expected+0.166 pct0.062 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share61.0%77 pct38.4%20 pct
Chances for per 602.8470 pct2.0941 pct
Chances against per 601.8272 pct3.3512 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.0644 pct+0.2364 pct
Creates per 60+0.2473 pct−0.2013 pct
Prevents per 60−0.1714 pct+0.4498 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →