Skip to content

Filip Hallander vs Bo Horvat

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Bo Horvat is ahead on 8 of 9 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Bo Horvat sits in the 89th percentile, Filip Hallander the 11th.

MeasureHallanderHorvat
Scoring · NHL
Points33
Goals12
Assists21
Ice time per game10:1719:37
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.3892 pct0.3993 pct
Shot attempts per game2.562 pct5.095 pct
Goals above expected+0.269 pct+0.889 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share—36.3%16 pct
Chances for per 60—2.1544 pct
Chances against per 60—3.776 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.2911 pct+0.5289 pct
Creates per 60−0.0529 pct+0.5796 pct
Prevents per 60−0.249 pct−0.0531 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →