Thomas Chabot vs Marcus Foligno
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Senators skaters
- William Eklund
- Drake Batherson
- Tim Stützle
- Stephen Halliday
- Michael Amadio
- Shane Pinto
- Dylan Cozens
- Thomas Chabot
- Claude Giroux
- Jordan Spence
- Fabian Zetterlund
- Hayden Hodgson
- Carter Yakemchuk
- Ridly Greig
- Warren Foegele
- Tyler Kleven
- Nikolas Matinpalo
- Nick Cousins
- Cameron Crotty
- Jake Sanderson
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Wild skaters
- Matt Boldy
- Kirill Kaprizov
- Quinn Hughes
- Blake Coleman
- Joel Eriksson Ek
- Maxim Shabanov
- Bobby Brink
- Marcus Foligno
- Danila Yurov
- Michael McCarron
- Nick Foligno
- Yakov Trenin
- Ryan Hartman
- Olli Maatta
- Jared Spurgeon
- Daemon Hunt
- Zach Bogosian
- Jonas Brodin
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Thomas Chabot is ahead on 9 of 13 measures. The widest gap is prevents per 60: Marcus Foligno sits in the 96th percentile, Thomas Chabot the 27th.
| Measure | Chabot | Foligno |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 2 | 0 |
| Goals | 1 | 0 |
| Assists | 1 | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 25:50 | 12:35 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.1250 pct | 0.1250 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 3.379 pct | 1.325 pct |
| Goals above expected | +0.681 pct | −0.422 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 50.1%46 pct | 36.5%16 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 2.8269 pct | 1.4514 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.8127 pct | 2.5338 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.1556 pct | +0.5891 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.2372 pct | +0.2574 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | −0.0827 pct | +0.3396 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →










































