Skip to content

Bokondji Imama vs Mikael Granlund

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Mikael Granlund is ahead on 9 of 13 measures. The widest gap is expected goals per game: Mikael Granlund sits in the 87th percentile, Bokondji Imama the 6th.

MeasureImamaGranlund
Scoring · NHL
Points02
Goals01
Assists01
Ice time per game6:2120:35
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.016 pct0.3187 pct
Shot attempts per game0.32 pct3.073 pct
Goals above expected0.057 pct+0.474 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share72.0%96 pct48.9%44 pct
Chances for per 600.892 pct1.023 pct
Chances against per 600.3599 pct1.0696 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.2667 pct+0.0948 pct
Creates per 60−0.1221 pct+0.1967 pct
Prevents per 60+0.3897 pct−0.1024 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →