Skip to content

Bo Horvat vs Tony DeAngelo

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Bo Horvat is ahead on 10 of 13 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Bo Horvat sits in the 89th percentile, Tony DeAngelo the 3rd.

MeasureHorvatDeAngelo
Scoring · NHL
Points30
Goals20
Assists10
Ice time per game19:3717:43
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.3993 pct0.0735 pct
Shot attempts per game5.095 pct2.047 pct
Goals above expected+0.889 pct−0.234 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share36.3%16 pct50.4%47 pct
Chances for per 602.1544 pct2.5860 pct
Chances against per 603.776 pct2.5438 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.5289 pct−0.463 pct
Creates per 60+0.5796 pct−0.0430 pct
Prevents per 60−0.0531 pct−0.421 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →