Skip to content

Mika Zibanejad vs Ivar Stenberg

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Mika Zibanejad is ahead on 9 of 13 measures. The widest gap is chances for per 60: Mika Zibanejad sits in the 67th percentile, Ivar Stenberg the 1st.

MeasureZibanejadStenberg
Scoring · NHL
Points51
Goals10
Assists41
Ice time per game20:4014:19
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.2680 pct0.0525 pct
Shot attempts per game2.664 pct0.78 pct
Goals above expected−0.327 pct−0.141 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share57.1%66 pct27.0%5 pct
Chances for per 602.7667 pct0.751 pct
Chances against per 602.0859 pct2.0362 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.0334 pct−0.0136 pct
Creates per 60−0.0334 pct−0.0332 pct
Prevents per 600.0042 pct+0.0349 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →