Skip to content

Chris Tanev vs Filip Hallander

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Filip Hallander is ahead on 7 of 10 measures. The widest gap is expected goals per game: Filip Hallander sits in the 92nd percentile, Chris Tanev the 3rd.

MeasureTanevHallander
Scoring · NHL
Points03
Goals01
Assists02
Ice time per game18:5110:17
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.003 pct0.3892 pct
Shot attempts per game0.32 pct2.562 pct
Goals above expected0.062 pct+0.269 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share38.4%20 pct—
Chances for per 602.0941 pct—
Chances against per 603.3512 pct—
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.2364 pct−0.2911 pct
Creates per 60−0.2013 pct−0.0529 pct
Prevents per 60+0.4498 pct−0.249 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →