Skip to content

Victor Hedman vs Stephen Halliday

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Stephen Halliday is ahead on 10 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Stephen Halliday sits in the 79th percentile, Victor Hedman the 11th.

MeasureHedmanHalliday
Scoring · NHL
Points01
Goals01
Assists00
Ice time per game15:4710:08
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0527 pct0.2883 pct
Shot attempts per game1.736 pct2.357 pct
Goals above expected−0.240 pct+0.267 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share51.9%51 pct54.2%59 pct
Chances for per 603.6693 pct4.4198 pct
Chances against per 603.4011 pct3.727 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.2911 pct+0.3879 pct
Creates per 60−0.0430 pct+0.5092 pct
Prevents per 60−0.258 pct−0.1222 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →