Butler vs. Dayton: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats

Butler4-3
▸
Dayton2-5
Final
Welcome StadiumConference game
BUTLTeam statsDAYT
342Total yards288
191Pass183
151Rush105
16First downs17
1-93rd down7-19
1Turnovers2
27:57Possession32:03
- Q4 1:47BUTLRyan Lezon 9 Yd pass from Bret Bushka (Luka Zurak Kick)37–10
- Q4 4:12BUTLJyran Mitchell 59 Yd Run (Luka Zurak Kick)30–10
- Q4 5:42DAYTLuke Hansen 2 Yd Run (Sam Webster Kick)23–10
- Q3 8:26BUTLLuka Zurak 36 Yd Field Goal 23–3
- Q2 4:04BUTLJyran Mitchell 3 Yd pass from Bret Bushka (Luka Zurak Kick)20–3
- Q2 10:07DAYTSam Webster 32 Yd Field Goal 13–3
- Q1 1:39BUTLLuka Zurak 46 Yd Field Goal 13–0
- Q1 5:21BUTLJyran Mitchell 24 Yd Run (Luka Zurak Kick)10–0
- Q1 7:07BUTLLuka Zurak 24 Yd Field Goal 3–0
How the model called it
Market line
BUTL −7
Against the number
BUTL covered
line BUTL −7
Kickoff146 plays →Final
Tap or hover on the chart to see play details
DAYT (top)BUTL (bottom)· colored dots = scoresFinal: DAYT 0%
Closing line
BUTL −7
Closing total
48.5
Model line
—
Actual result
BUTL 37 – 10 DAYT
Butler
- PassBret Bushka 18/23, 191 YDS, 2 TD, 1 INT
- RushJyran Mitchell 16 CAR, 117 YDS, 2 TD
- RecEthan Loss 6 REC, 86 YDS
Dayton
- PassDrew VanVleet 30/48, 183 YDS
- RushLuke Hansen 9 CAR, 54 YDS, 1 TD
- RecJake Coleman 7 REC, 52 YDS
27.3sper snap · slower the national 24.5s
fastnational avgslow
Snaps run
132
Points / snap
0.36
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsBUTL up 20 entering the 4th quarter. Across 815 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
98%
BUTL went on to win
A near-lock historically
FAQ
What was the final score of Butler vs. Dayton?
Butler 37, Dayton 10.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
No — the model picked DAYT, which didn't hit. We report the misses too.
BUTL
DAYT
41%
Success rate
37%
0.58
EPA / pass
-0.05
0.02
EPA / rush
0.16
43%
Early-down success
36%
61%
Pass success
30%
26%
Rush success
50%
11%
Explosive play rate (15+ yds)
1%
19%
Stuffed rush rate
18%
43%
Pass rate
64%
7.2
Avg 3rd-down distance
6.6
BUTL
7.2 yards to go on 3rd down
54 scrimmage snaps
DAYT
6.6 yards to go on 3rd down
78 scrimmage snaps
| BUTL | DAYT | |
|---|---|---|
| 342 | Total yards | 288 |
| 191 | Passing yards | 183 |
| 151 | Rushing yards | 105 |
| 16 | First downs | 17 |
| 1-9 | 3rd down | 7-19 |
| 3-3 | 4th down | 3-5 |
| 18/23 | Comp/Att | 30/49 |
| 8.3 | Yards per pass | 3.7 |
| 4.9 | Yards per rush | 3.6 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 0-0 | Penalties | 6-61 |
| 27:57 | Possession | 32:03 |
BUTL
6/7 with the model
−0.1 pts · −0.0% win prob
DAYT
6/10 with the model
−1.8 pts · −0.0% win prob
Costliest call
Q4 14:04 DAYT go for it on 4th & 10 at BUTL 18. The model preferred field goal, a gap of 0.95 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finishBUTL 7/12 scoring drives← own end zone →DAYT 2/11 scoring drives
DAYTPUNT3 pl, 6 yds· own 25Q1
BUTLFG11 pl, 41 yds· opp 48Q1
DAYTFUM3 pl, 4 yds· own 20Q1
BUTLTD1 pl, 24 yds· opp 24Q1
DAYTPUNT3 pl, 2 yds· own 8Q1
BUTLFG4 pl, 6 yds· opp 35Q1
DAYTFG14 pl, 60 yds· own 25Q1
BUTLTD11 pl, 75 yds· own 25Q2
DAYTPUNT9 pl, 28 yds· own 25Q2
BUTLEND2 pl, 9 yds· own 20Q2
BUTLPUNT3 pl, 3 yds· own 25Q3
DAYTPUNT5 pl, 18 yds· own 25Q3
BUTLFG5 pl, 57 yds· own 24Q3
DAYTPUNT5 pl, 14 yds· own 25Q3
BUTLINT8 pl, 50 yds· own 29Q3
DAYTDOWNS12 pl, 39 yds· own 43Q3
BUTLPUNT3 pl, 5 yds· own 18Q4
DAYTTD18 pl, 67 yds· own 33Q4
BUTLTD3 pl, 75 yds· own 25Q4
DAYTDOWNS4 pl, 0 yds· own 12Q4
BUTLTD4 pl, 12 yds· opp 12Q4
DAYTFUM3 pl, 26 yds· own 34Q4
BUTLEND2 pl, 0 yds· own 42Q4
- Q4 1:47BUTLRyan Lezon 9 Yd pass from Bret Bushka (Luka Zurak Kick)37–10
- Q4 4:12BUTLJyran Mitchell 59 Yd Run (Luka Zurak Kick)30–10
- Q4 5:42DAYTLuke Hansen 2 Yd Run (Sam Webster Kick)23–10
- Q3 8:26BUTLLuka Zurak 36 Yd Field Goal 23–3
- Q2 4:04BUTLJyran Mitchell 3 Yd pass from Bret Bushka (Luka Zurak Kick)20–3
- Q2 10:07DAYTSam Webster 32 Yd Field Goal 13–3
- Q1 1:39BUTLLuka Zurak 46 Yd Field Goal 13–0
- Q1 5:21BUTLJyran Mitchell 24 Yd Run (Luka Zurak Kick)10–0
- Q1 7:07BUTLLuka Zurak 24 Yd Field Goal 3–0
Model prediction
how the number is builtOne or both teams lack a power rating (often an FCS opponent), so the model prediction is low-confidence for this game.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →
