Sacramento State vs. Nevada: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats

Sacramento State

Nevada0-1
▸Final
Mackay Stadium
SACTeam statsNEV
371Total yards409
225Pass144
146Rush265
15First downs23
2-123rd down4-12
1Turnovers2
27:14Possession32:42
- Q4 2:17NEVJonathan Maldonado 36 Yd Interception Return (Joe McFadden Kick)17–20
- Q2 0:00NEVJoe McFadden 40 Yd Field Goal17–13
- Q2 0:53SACErnest Campbell 75 Yd pass from Cardell Williams (Grant Meadors Kick)17–10
- Q2 1:02NEVChubba Purdy 3 Yd Run (Joe McFadden Kick)10–10
- Q2 7:17NEVJoe McFadden 37 Yd Field Goal10–3
- Q2 13:04SACGrant Meadors 35 Yd Field Goal 10–0
- Q1 10:55SACRodney Hammond Jr. 5 Yd Run (Grant Meadors Kick)7–0
How the model called it
Market line
NEV −8.5
Against the number
SAC covered
line NEV −8.5
What the numbers say
- SAC played behind the sticks — third downs that long convert rarely, and NEV did not face the same ones. 3rd & 11.4 vs 3rd & 7.6
Kickoff156 plays →Final
Tap or hover on the chart to see play details
NEV (top)SAC (bottom)· colored dots = scoresFinal: NEV 100%
Closing line
NEV −8.5
Closing total
56.0
Model line
—
Actual result
SAC 17 – 20 NEV
Sacramento State
- PassCardell Williams 11/13, 158 YDS, 1 TD, 1 INT
- RushJamar Curtis 8 CAR, 37 YDS
- RecErnest Campbell 3 REC, 89 YDS, 1 TD
Nevada
- PassChubba Purdy 12/21, 144 YDS, 2 INT
- RushChubba Purdy 21 CAR, 111 YDS, 1 TD
- RecMarcus Bellon 2 REC, 59 YDS
27.2sper snap · slower the national 24.5s
fastnational avgslow
Snaps run
132
Points / snap
0.28
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsSAC up 4 entering the 4th quarter. Across 1,449 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
65%
SAC went on to win
A genuinely vulnerable lead — comebacks are common
FAQ
What was the final score of Sacramento State vs. Nevada?
Sacramento State 17, Nevada 20.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
Yes — the model's pick (NEV) was correct.
SAC
NEV
38%
Success rate
44%
0.02
EPA / pass
-0.45
0.16
EPA / rush
0.26
41%
Early-down success
46%
32%
Pass success
42%
42%
Rush success
46%
12%
Explosive play rate (15+ yds)
17%
16%
Stuffed rush rate
23%
37%
Pass rate
33%
11.4
Avg 3rd-down distance
7.6
SAC
11.4 yards to go on 3rd down
60 scrimmage snaps
NEV
7.6 yards to go on 3rd down
72 scrimmage snaps
| SAC | NEV | |
|---|---|---|
| 371 | Total yards | 409 |
| 225 | Passing yards | 144 |
| 146 | Rushing yards | 265 |
| 15 | First downs | 23 |
| 2-12 | 3rd down | 4-12 |
| 2-3 | 4th down | 2-4 |
| 14/19 | Comp/Att | 12/21 |
| 11.8 | Yards per pass | 6.9 |
| 3.6 | Yards per rush | 5.5 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 9-71 | Penalties | 7-62 |
| 27:14 | Possession | 32:42 |
SAC
3/8 with the model
−2.5 pts · −0.0% win prob
NEV
4/7 with the model
−1.3 pts · −0.0% win prob
Costliest call
Q1 6:39 SAC punt on 4th & 1 at SAC 17. The model preferred go for it, a gap of 0.85 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finishSAC 4/10 scoring drives← own end zone →NEV 3/10 scoring drives
SACTD9 pl, 75 yds· own 25Q1
NEVINT10 pl, 51 yds· own 26Q1
SACPUNT3 pl, 9 yds· own 8Q1
NEVPUNT3 pl, -6 yds· opp 38Q1
SACFG16 pl, 81 yds· own 1Q1
NEVFG10 pl, 60 yds· own 25Q2
SACDOWNS9 pl, 20 yds· own 25Q2
NEVTD6 pl, 45 yds· opp 45Q2
SACTD1 pl, 75 yds· own 25Q2
NEVFG6 pl, 52 yds· own 25Q2
NEVINT8 pl, 32 yds· own 25Q3
SACPUNT3 pl, 3 yds· opp 48Q3
NEVPUNT7 pl, 55 yds· own 1Q3
SACPUNT5 pl, -1 yds· own 20Q3
NEVDOWNS8 pl, 57 yds· own 22Q3
SACPUNT6 pl, 19 yds· own 21Q4
NEVDOWNS12 pl, 53 yds· own 21Q4
SACTD2 pl, 3 yds· own 26Q4
SACMISS9 pl, 51 yds· own 25Q4
NEVEND1 pl, -13 yds· own 24Q4
- Q4 2:17NEVJonathan Maldonado 36 Yd Interception Return (Joe McFadden Kick)17–20
- Q2 0:00NEVJoe McFadden 40 Yd Field Goal17–13
- Q2 0:53SACErnest Campbell 75 Yd pass from Cardell Williams (Grant Meadors Kick)17–10
- Q2 1:02NEVChubba Purdy 3 Yd Run (Joe McFadden Kick)10–10
- Q2 7:17NEVJoe McFadden 37 Yd Field Goal10–3
- Q2 13:04SACGrant Meadors 35 Yd Field Goal 10–0
- Q1 10:55SACRodney Hammond Jr. 5 Yd Run (Grant Meadors Kick)7–0
Model prediction
how the number is builtOne or both teams lack a power rating (often an FCS opponent), so the model prediction is low-confidence for this game.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →
