Sat, Dec 6, 1:00 AM
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNT | 7 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 21 |
| TULN | 7 | 17 | 7 | 3 | 34 |
Our model blends Elo ratings (TULN Elo 1587, UNT Elo 1756) plus home-field advantage. That projects TULN +4.4 (37% to win) — 2.9 points of value on UNT versus the market line of +1.5.
TULN up 18 entering the 4th quarter. Across 838 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
North Texas 21, Tulane 34.
No — the model picked UNT, which didn't hit. We report the misses too.
Why trust the number?Gridpex's model is walk-forward validated on 2014–24, out-of-sample: +0.28 pts mean Closing Line Value and 53.5% beat the close. We report the record — wins and losses — never fake locks.
I had UNT pregame and it didn't hit. We report the misses — that was one.